Alcala 1958
gen era l bar ex am ina tio nas do es any oth er law sch ool gradua te. Howe ver , su ch pra ctic al asp ects are in my mind rel ati ve lyunimporta nt.Acc redita tion is on ly a pa ssi ng hur dle on the wa y to cre ati ng he re in San Di eg o at Alcala Pa rk a law sch oo lthat is sec ond to none in the Un ite dSta tes in the qu ali tyof the edu cat ion of fer edto the stud ents ,in the qu ali ty of tho se stu den ts and fin ally, in tha t all imp ort ant res pe ct, the qu ali ty of the fin ish ed pro duct. Th at pro duc t is a law yer wh o is no t on ly an edu cat edma n, but also a who le ma n, a man wh o look s upo n hi s pro fes sionas an inte gra l and vita l par t of the life of the en tir e commu nity ,cit y, stat e and na tio n. I antic ipa tetha t in the comingacad em ic yea r the law sch oo l will bec ome a sch ool fu lly acc red ite dby the Ca lifo rni aComm it tee of Bar Ex am ine rs. I can promis e that under the lea der shi p,gu ida nc ean d insp ira tion of su ch me n as Bis hop Cha rles F. Buddy , LL .D., of Sa n Di eg o, Found erand Pr esi den t of the Un ive rsi ty, and Ms gr. Jam es T. Bo oth , J.C .D. , Reg ent of the Sch ool of Law , we are alr ead y well on our wa y to at tainin gour lar ger goa ls. After ac cre dit ati on , or per hap s eve ncon cur ren tly the rew ith , I ant icip ate tha t our ne xt ste p wi ll be the esta blishm ent of a da y law sch ool , wh ich will be run in con junctio n with our alr ead yest abl ish ednig ht sch ool . It is my tho ught that a nig ht law school ful fill s a pr eci ou s dut y to the com mu nit y, a dut y tha t sho uld nev er be for gotten. It is on ly the ni gh tlaw sch ool that can off er edu cat ion alopp ort uni tiesto those wh o for one reas on or- ano ther, usu ally eco nomi c, are unabl e to tak e adv ant ageof a full day tim e pro gram,but who nev erth eles sdes erv e an opp ort uni ty to furt her thei r edu cat ion toward s so wo rthwh ile a goa l. Those who atte nd nig ht law school while sup por ting themse lves an d the ir fam ilies are usu ally charac ter ize dby remarkable dete rmi nat ion i ation l uate. r, cti al ts tively rtant. it - l ing l ting o l it d tes lity - i ed ts, lity ts l , t ct, lity - roduct. t l ted , h l , s fession l l t e nity, , ti n. i te i g e ic l e l ll ited b ia it- iners. i e ship, nce i - rl , . ., o, er t i rsity, . es , . ., t l , y t i i g ls. ditation, s even con- tly ith, i i ate li ment of a l, i r - i y li hed night l. t school filJs ious t nity, l tt . It l t law chool educational opportunities to those who for . , ll ic, le tage - , t ele e tunity her tion s t hile l. l ting s lves ilies ll terized able ination l
It is my con vic tion that a law school is bui lt upo n three fun dament als :the prin cip les for whi ch it sta nd s; the cal ibr e of its fa cu lty ;and its gre at wo rki ng tool , its librar y. Fou r yea rs ag o our law scho ol had no librar y. Now its librar y stand s sec ond in the cou nty onl y to the law libr ary own ed by the cou nty its elf . Th e fou r years pas t are be hin dus now , and we now must look forw ard to the com in g yea rs and to the pro gress tha t the y pro mi se. Th e ne xt ste p in that pro gre ss is, in my op ini on , to obtain wh at is termed "a ccredi tat ion " by the Califo rni aCommit tee of Bar Ex amine rs. Th e differ encebet wee nan accred itedlaw sch ool in Ca liforni a and an unacc redite d one is per hap s ma gn ifi edin the mi nds of many pers ons .Ess ent iallythe on lypra ctic al dif fer en cema y be that aft er com ple tion of the firs t yea r in an unacc redited law school ea ch studen t must tak e the fir st yea rlaw stud ent s'exa mina tion,or "b ab ybar ," as it is ofte n cal led . I per sonally do not view thi s as an y gre at hand icap. Th e purp ose of thi s exa mi na tio n is to check the pro gre ss of the stud ent and to gi ve him an oppor tun ity to det erm ine if hi s law sch ool is gi vi ng him the edu cat ionhe des erv es. As such, the exa mi na tio nalso gi ve sthe sch ool a contin uou s check on the qu ali ty of its ins tru ctio n. Nor ha ve ou r studen ts any cau se to fea r thi s exam ina tio n.Our reco rd ov er the past thre e yea rs show s that 10 0 pe r cen t, 87 per cen t and 10 0 per cen t of ou r studen ts who took the exami na tion passed it. Th is com par esext rem elyfavor ab ly wit h sta tew ide sta tist ics , wh ich show tha t less than 50 per cen t of all thos e tak ing th is exami nat ionpas s. Oth erwise acc red ita tionor the lack of it ha s per hap s no really pra ctical disa dva n tag es, ass um ing ar gu en do tha t thi s exami na tio n is in fac t a dis advanta ge.Th e law school gradua te froman unacc red ited school ha s ev ery bi t as go oda sta nd ingto take the i tion l e tals: - l s; e lty; t ing , y. s l y. y s t lf. d , - s ress ise. res o , tation" rnia it- iners. ence ited l l a redited s ified . tial y l cti al ence l tion t redited l t r s' i tion, y , . s l icap. ose s ination res - it ine if l giving him tion es. ination s l cont uous lity in ction. ts use to fear i ation. s s , ent and 100 per cent of ts nation i res ely favor- l t i e statistics, which show t of all those taking i ation s. r i itation s cti l n- , a urning en.do i- ti n vantage. te from redited chool ing
34
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker