ADS Capstone Chronicles Revised

5

da nu dr i na rge sohf toernt gaaptphoe irnetdmteonot sl a t(ea s( a fAt eS rC Oa pnaot iteens )t idso catlor re)a. dOyu rs gy omapl ti no mu saitni cg aagngdr e gt ha ut es d vmi sei at isnugr e as tsoe c mt i oond e ol f g adset rmi co gcraanpcheirc , r iSs Dk OaHc r, o as ns da hc er oa sl tsh- ea qn ua liyt ys i s ftahcat to cr sa n ibse ut os e dptroo pv irdoev i dae al ahri gg eh--sl ec va el el vf ui er twh eorf rSeDs eOaHr cnhe, eadnsd aicnrcoesnst itvhi ez ec oh ue na lttrhy , psl pa nu sr tt oh a fturret ihme br ui rnsvee ps tr oi vn i dvearl su ef o- br aSsDeOd Hc aa rs es e ms s omdeenl st and intervention (as suggested by ASCO). 3.2 Socioeconomic disparities in gastric cancer and identification of a single SES variable for predicting risk Bv aerf oi orue sd i tvyi pn eg si n ot of oeuxri sotwi nng wSoDr Ok ,Hw es tdui dd i reesv itehwe Ao fSt Ce nO fpooclui csye ds t oa nt e smpeenc ti f mi c eSnDt Oi oHn ef da c, two hr si cahnwd /e or er s2p0e2c1i f, i cr epsoepa ur cl ahtei or sn sa. tOtnhee s Mu cohn st et uf idoyr ei s Mt headti,c ianl Ce veanltueart ae nd dt hAel bi me rpt aEcitnosft eeidnuCc oa tl li eogne, ionfc Mo me de i, cainnde occupation (as proxy measures for sdoecvieoleocpoi nn og mg ai cs t rsitca ct ua ns )c e or n( S ar ri skke r oeft aal . , p2a0t 2i e1n)t. Ws e xh,e na nedv a rl uaac tei n wg eeraec hc ovna trri ao bl l leed’ s fiomr .p aLcot ,g iasgt iec, rweegrree s sbi ouni l tm ouds ei nl sg t oeparcehd i cvtagrai asbt rl iec caanndc e rtrhiesnk “ccr oi tme rpi oa nr e] ,dc - sutsaitni sgt i cAs ,I Ca n d[ Apksaeiuk de o -iRn fsoqrumaar tei ot no dp er et edri mc t ii vnee tahbei l mi t yo”d e( Sl at hr ka at rh aedt tahl e. , h2i0g2h1e )s .t rTihs ke ac or trircel el a tfeodu n dw i tt hh a t g aasl lt r itch r ecea nvcaerri a brliessk , wbe ruet “veadr iuacbaitl ii ot yn” ac no dn t tr hi buus t e“ dc a nt hbee me mo sptl o yt oe d ma so daenl ideal single indicator of” gastric cancer risk

wb ehoebnt ami nuel tdi p” l(eS asrokcei or eectoanl .o, m2 0i c2 1“)f a. c t o r s c a n n o t Twhoerrkei si sv anl uo adbol eu ibnt btehtat te rSua nr kdaerr set ta nadl .i’ ns g( w2 0h2i c1h) fHaoc wt oer vs e rc, ot hn et rrieb ua rt ee t wt oo kgeays tarri ce a sc ua np coenr w rhiisckh. wp l ea ni n tt oe n idn vt oe sat idgda tue p oh no wi n tohuer cwo omr bk i. nFaitrisotn, woef ml e nudl t i pt ol e mS Do rOeH rfoabcut osrt s parnedd ihc teiavlet hmmoedterlisc st hc aa nn ii nn dv ei vsitdi guaatli-nl egv eol nde a tfaa citso ro fat et na h at irmd e t. oS eocbot anidn, uc annt i l ibt ei s teoaos illayt e :oabgtgari ne ge da t e fcooru npt yr -elve evne lt adt ai vt ae mo nel ays uor be st a, i nbeudt i na fdt ievri d upaalt-ileenvtesl da al rteaa di sy ovf ti es int du soec t oarvsa wi l ai tbhl es ycmo up nt ot my - sl e. vTehl u sd, aitna o ruart hweorr kt,hwa ne ipnrdoifvi liedsu aolf- lheivgehl - dr iastka iinndtihv ei dhuoapl se porf i oi dr etnot itf hy ienmg ehveeanl t h cvai sriet iangge n ac i e sh ot os pbiet aalb. l eTthoep r ge ov eanl t ai st i v ef ol yr cs cohnedduuc lte oc aunt rceear c hs c r teoe n isnugcsh, a innndui va li d pu rail ms a rt oy cmaorerev.isits, case worker consults if needed, and 3.3 The Impact of Racial Disparities and SDOH on Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Outcomes ISnu r 2g e0r2y4 , ar et s e at hr ceh e rUsn iivne rtshi tey D eopf a r tMmi cehnitg aonf icna vnecsetri goa ut et cdo mt hees (i Bmopnanc et r o&f Er adcwe a rodns , g2a0s2t 4r i)c. Td ihseaidr v arne tsaegaer dc ht hfroouungdh o tuht atth emi ri ngoa rs ittriiecs c awnec reer j“ohuigrhneerys for four key reasons. First, there is a incidence of disease” within m2 0a2r 4g )i n. aF lui zr et hde r mg rooruep, s“ m(aBr og ni nnael ri z e &d g rEoduwp sa radrse, significantly less likely to receive guideline 96