ADS Capstone Chronicles Revised

25

tahded fcaocmt pt hl iacta ttihoenys taor ec acnocme ro rt rbei da ti tmi eesn tt h. a t m a y Ii mn pt eo rr mt a sn coef fcorru cMi aol d Se Dl i nOgH Af pa pc troorasc, ht h2e wf ei lal t un roet bi net oh ewl phf ui cl hb eucna ud seer l ywi neg d oS DnOoHt h af evaet uvries si b i lai rt ye wf r oi tmh i n tehaec h fSeDa Ot uHr eP CiAm cpoomr tpa no nc ee n tg. rHaopwh e vfeorr, Mt h or edee l mi n og sAt ppprreodai cc thi v1e, wS De OcHa nf as ceteo rt hs awt et hr ee tt oh pe tpoetracl e nwt ae gi gehot fe ad c opuo np tuyl ’ast pi oonp uol af t iao nctohuant tsyp, e at hk es lciomuint et yd’ s Epnogpl ius hl a, t i oann d wtiht he ap ecroc el lnetgaeg ed eogfr eae (l oi ng ci cl ua dl i nkge ay n af as cs toocri sa t e a’ ss d ecgorue ne t) y. T hpeospe ual ar et i oa nl l iimndpiavcidtsualtsh, e availability of resources for English ability impacts aacrecessibility of healthcare, and college degrees often associated with increased uh enadlet hr sctaarnedsi ny gs t e mo f a nhdoiwn c r etaos e dn awvei gaal tthe t ot hb ee able to do so. Predicted vs. Actual Values Ft roari n et hdeo nf idnaatla fmr oomd eMl o(dt he lei n gL iAg ph pt Gr oBaMc h m2 )o, dweel wvaelnuet s ofnor totheintveessttidgaatteasehtowcomthpearepdretdoicttehde aF ci gt uu ar el , 5o. 3b sbeerlvoewd s vh aolwu es st hfeo ra c tt hu ea l tveasl tu edsaitna st he te. tpersetd idcat et adsbe yt oounr Lt hi geh txG- aBxMi s mvoedr se ul os nt thhee vy a- al ux ei ss. Tr ehseu lrte dw loi un led dhe anvoet el so owkheadt lai kpee rwf ei tcht pa r es ldoi pc tei oonf ehxaavcet lbye eonn et haese xeavcetr ys apmree daisc ttehde vaac ltuuea l wv aoluuled. Tv ehres ucso ar rc et ul aatli ovna l uceose fi fsi ci inecnl ut doefd ti hn et hper et odpi c lteefdt (0.9802, which is quite high). Figure 5.3 Comparing the Actual versus Predicted Values in the Test Dataset for the Final LightGBM Model Af alst chionuagt ihn bg ottoh df eeal vt ue r ienitmo ,pwo ret awnicl el bg reahpehrsewa fet er er ud sa itna g f or onml y tMh eo dLei lgi hn tgG BA Mp p mr ooadc ehl 2t r aai sn eodu or nf i tnhael ma noddselli,gdhut ley thoi giht se rs ltiegshttsl ye tl oa dwj eurs tteeds tRs e t R M S E 2 value. 5.4 Final Model: Comparison of

116